Article Production
Turn priority prompts into clear, evidence-backed articles with editorial review, structured answers, and a practical publishing handoff.
What this service includes
We connect each article to a buyer question and a useful next step. Production covers briefs, research, drafting, fact checks, and revision, with clear responsibilities for brand approval and publishing.
Topic planning and writing briefs
Research, drafting, and editorial review
Publication assets and refresh priorities
Service breakdown
The full GEO program includes 30 LLM-friendly articles per month, typically 800–2,000 words each. Language, formats, review rounds, and publishing responsibilities are confirmed before production.
Plan topics and briefs
Align the editorial queue with the questions most relevant to your product.
- Use Prompt Search findings or the client’s approved topic list.
- Specify audience, intent, outline, evidence needs, and the intended next action.
- Plan guides, comparisons, alternatives, FAQs, and use-case articles.
Research and write useful answers
Build articles around specific answers, useful examples, and traceable sources.
- Combine client product materials, original examples, and relevant primary sources.
- Use descriptive headings, concise answers, and comparison tables where useful.
- Keep brand claims, product capabilities, and limitations consistent with approved facts.
Review facts and brand expression
Review every draft before handing it over for approval.
- Check supporting sources, factual consistency, clarity, and repetitive phrasing.
- Review product details and brand tone with the client.
- Resolve feedback and deliver the agreed final version with its source references.
Prepare publishing and future updates
Make the final article easy to publish and connect to ongoing review.
- Provide titles, meta descriptions, internal-link suggestions, and applicable schema guidance.
- Hand approved files to the client for website publishing; confirm any extra distribution separately.
- Map published URLs back to prompt groups and use monitoring findings to prioritize updates.
Delivery and acceptance
What you receive and how we review it
Article Production turns a researched question into a publishable answer with a clear point of view and verifiable support. The same prompt ID follows the article from brief to approval, published URL, and later monitoring.
Editorial brief and evidence pack
What is inside
Primary question and intent; intended reader; proposed title; page format; answer outline; source requirements; internal links; CTA; product facts that need approval.
Acceptance criteria
The brief makes the main decision explicit and identifies the evidence needed before the article is written.
Reviewed article and source notes
What is inside
A complete draft with direct answers, examples, comparison criteria where relevant, limitations, relevant references, and documented review changes.
Acceptance criteria
Facts and comparisons are checked. The article addresses the brief, uses the approved brand voice, and resolves the agreed review comments.
Publishing package and URL record
What is inside
Title and meta description; suggested slug; heading structure; internal links and anchor text; applicable image captions, alt text, and schema recommendations; final-file version and publishing checklist.
Acceptance criteria
The publishing owner can implement the approved page without guessing its structure. The published URL and date are returned to the content and monitoring register.
Illustrative example · not client data
Inside a GEO article brief
Illustrative brief for the meeting-software scenario. Product claims require research and testing; this example does not describe a real client deliverable or result.
- Reader and decision
- A sales operations lead selecting an assistant for a 20-person bilingual team; the article should help them shortlist and plan a trial.
- Proposed article
- How to evaluate AI meeting assistants for bilingual sales teams: transcription, CRM handoff, and access controls.
- Opening answer
- Start the evaluation with a representative call, check mixed-language accuracy and speaker attribution, then verify that the required follow-up fields reach your CRM. Explain how to judge each test before comparing products.
- Article structure
- 1. Who the guide fits. 2. Evaluation criteria. 3. Test method and sample. 4. Product comparison with sources. 5. Limits and unsuitable cases. 6. Trial checklist and next step.
- Evidence requirements
- Document the test date, language mix, sample length, and scoring approach. Cite current product docs for CRM support and plan limits. Separate tested findings from vendor-stated capabilities.
- Comparison rules
- Use the same criteria and test conditions across products. Mark untested capabilities and unavailable data. Date pricing references and specify billing terms.
- Links and next action
- Link to the relevant integration documentation, security information, and product trial page. Match the CTA to evaluation rather than interrupting the answer.
- After publishing
- Record the approved URL and prompt IDs. Recheck brand descriptions, visible citations, and identifiable referral behavior during the next agreed monitoring cycle.
The quality checks behind the delivery
- Answer quality: the main question is answered early, key constraints are addressed, and important terms are defined in context.
- Evidence quality: numerical claims, pricing, feature support, and comparisons have dated, traceable support.
- Original value: the page adds a useful test, example, decision framework, or expert explanation suited to the brief.
- Editorial quality: titles describe the sections, repetition is removed, and each table or list helps a real decision.
- Brand accuracy: a reviewer confirms product statements, positioning, and unsuitable use cases before publication.
- Publishing quality: the final page preserves source links, readable text, metadata, internal links, and agreed conversion actions.
What we need to get started
- Approved prompt groups and page priorities, or a topic list that we first check for intent and existing coverage.
- Product documentation, feature and pricing facts, brand voice, available expert interviews, original tests, or approved case material.
- A product reviewer, publishing owner, target language, preferred format, and agreed revision and approval arrangements.
How the work moves into the next stage
We own briefs, drafting, editorial review, and the agreed final publishing package. The client validates product facts and approves and publishes the content. GEO Monitoring receives the live URLs, related prompts, and change dates so future revisions respond to evidence.
Read our complete GEO methodFAQ
Frequently asked questions
Scope, delivery, and collaboration questions about Article Production.
Want the same structure tailored to your acquisition goals?
We can map the priority channels, recommend the first workstream, and show how the engagement would be scoped around your growth motion.
